Links & Downloads
Nematoda 2018; 5: 0-0
Abstract:Red ring disease (RRD) is of particular importance in many African oil palms- and coconut-producing regions in Central and South America and the Caribbean. Its causal agent, the nematode Bursaphelenchus cocophilus (Cobb) Baujard, causes extensive damage to tissues in the plant trunk that typically leads to plant death within months. Nearly 100 years after its first report RRD remains understudied largely because the nematode cannot be cultured in vivo or in vitro, what hinders sustained research efforts on basic and applied aspects of the pathosystem. To overcome this problem we attempted in vivo culturing in coconut seedlings, paying attention to aspects that had been overlooked in previous trials. We also attempted in vitro culturing on several fungi endophytic to healthy and RRD-affected coconut trees. In the two in vivo assays performed we were able to recover hundreds of nematodes from the seedlings up to 60 days after inoculation, but the nematodes seemed unable to sustain parasitism in most seedlings. No nematode was recovered from the endophytic fungal cultures in neither of the two assays performed. Hence B. cocophilus continues to stand as the only obligatory plant-parasitic species of the speciose genus Bursaphelenchus and a somewhat intractable plant-parasitic nematode to study on.
- Culturing of the nematode in coconut seedlings was marginally successful.
- Culturing of the nematode on several fungi endophytic to coconut was not successful.
Keywords:red ring disease, nematode culturing, obligatory plant-parasitic species.
1. Martins CR, Jesus Júnior LA. 2011. Evolução da produção de coco no Brasil e o comércio internacional – Panorama 2010. Série Documentos, 164. Embrapa, Aracaju, 30 pp.
2. Chinchilla CM. 1991. The red ring little leaf syndrome in oil palm and coconut palm. ASD Oil Palm Papers, 1: 1-17.
3. Giblin-Davis RM. 1993. Interactions of nematodes with insects. In: Khan MK (ed.). Nematode interactions. Chapman & Hall, London, p. 302-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1488-2_15.
4. Blair GP, Darling HM. 1968. Red ring disease of the coconut palm, inoculation studies and histopathology. Nematologica, 14: 395-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187529268X00075.
5. Cysne AQ, Rios AS, Krug C, Lima WAA. 2013. Manejo de Rynchophorus palmarum em campo de produção de sementes de palma de óleo. Embrapa, Brasília, 28 pp. Série Documentos.
6. Giblin-Davis RM, Gerber K, Griffith R. 1989. In vivo and in vitro culture of the red ring nematode, Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus. Nematropica, 19: 135-142.
7. Malaguti G. 1953. “Pudricion del cogollo” de la palmera de aceite africana (Ealeis guineensis Jacq.), em Venezuela. Agronomía Tropical, 3: 13-31.
8. van Hoof HA, Seinhorst JW. 1962. Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus associated with little leaf of coconut and oil palm. Tijdschrift Over Plantenziekten, 68: 251-258.
9. Fenwick DW, Mohammed S. 1964. Artificial infections of seednuts and youg seedlings of the coconut palm with the red-ring nematode Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus (Cobb). Nematologica, 10: 459-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187529264X00475.
10. Blair GP. 1965. The use of immature nuts of Cocos nucifera for studies on Rhadinaphelenchus cocophilus. Nematologia,
11: 590-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187529265X00735.
11. Ellis MB. 1971. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, 608 pp.
12. Ellis MB. 1976. More dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew, 507 pp.
13. Barnet HL, Hunter BB. 1972. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. American Phytopathological Society, Saint Paul, 218 pp.